DID YOU KNOW?ANITA'S ENDORSEMENT
KULIK TOLD US SHE WAS PRO-LIFE.THEN SHE ENDORSED A 100% PRO-ABORTION CANDIDATE.
DID ANITA KULIK FOOL US?
Bloam's own campaign materials describe her as “100% pro-choice, no matter what.” Kulik endorsed her anyway.
THE BRITTANY BLOAM RECORD / PA HOUSE DISTRICT 45
Brittany Bloam's record, backers and agenda show why James Julius is the district-first choice.
1 / THE DIFFERENCE
Three facts. Three questions District 45 deserves answered.
DID YOU KNOW?ANITA'S ENDORSEMENT
DID ANITA KULIK FOOL US?
Bloam's own campaign materials describe her as “100% pro-choice, no matter what.” Kulik endorsed her anyway.
DID YOU KNOW?ROOTS + VALUES
DOES BRITTANY BLOAM REALLY KNOW OUR COMMUNITIES—OR SHARE OUR VALUES?
Bloam is an Elk County native who had lived in her current District 45 home for about five years when she entered the race.
DID YOU KNOW?RECORD + PRIORITIES
IF BLOAM DOESN'T SHARE KULIK'S RECORD OR PRIORITIES, WHY DID KULIK ENDORSE HER?
Kulik supported Pennsylvania natural gas and Western Pennsylvania energy jobs. Bloam backed a new ride-hail tax, higher vehicle fees and offers no comparable plan for Pennsylvania natural gas or its workers.
THE COMPLETE DIFFERENCE RECORD
ANITA KULIK IS OLD-SCHOOL. DISTRICT-FIRST. WILLING TO BREAK WITH HER PARTY.
A conclusion supported by her local record, public statements and official votes—not a claim that she was conservative on every issue.TALE OF THE TAPE
ANITA KULIK
BRITTANY BLOAM
ANITA KULIK
BRITTANY BLOAM
ANITA KULIK
BRITTANY BLOAM
ANITA KULIK
BRITTANY BLOAM
ANITA KULIK
BRITTANY BLOAM
ANITA KULIK
BRITTANY BLOAM
1975–2002
2003–2016
2017–2026
2026 NOMINEE
THE LOCAL-SERVICE AND PRO-LIFE TRADITIONS SPAN MORE THAN 50 YEARS. BLOAM'S BREAK EXTENDS TO TAXES, SCHOOL POLICY, HEALTHCARE, FIREARMS, AND STATE SPENDING.
District boundaries changed over this period. This record describes the seat's representatives; it does not claim an unchanged electorate or that every resident shares one position.
SEE THE OFFICIAL RECORDSKULIK SERVED HERE BEFORE SHE REPRESENTED HERE.
BLOAM'S OWN POSITIONS BREAK WITH THAT TRADITION.
AN ENDORSEMENT IS NOT A VOTING RECORD.THE FINAL CHOICE / PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE DISTRICT 45
BORN HERE. RAISED HERE. RAISING HIS FAMILY HERE.


DOCUMENTED BACKGROUND
JAMES'S COMMITMENT
THE BRITTANY BLOAM RECORD / PA HOUSE DISTRICT 45
RECORD 11 / THE DISTRICT 45 SEAT
The familiar party label does not establish continuity. District 45's three prior Democratic officeholders brought substantial local-government experience and left extensive pro-life records, while Bloam's experience and broader agenda move in a different direction.
Pennsylvania House records list Democratic officeholders in District 45 continuously from 1969 through 2026. WESA says the district skews somewhat more conservative than other House districts in the area.
WESA describes Anita Kulik as the Allegheny County House delegation's most conservative Democrat, while PublicSource reports that she won her last two elections by 16 and 26 points and significantly outran other Democrats on those ballots.
The three representatives before Bloam's nomination all entered the House after substantial municipal service: Trello after nine years on Coraopolis Council; Kotik after McKees Rocks Council, legislative-aide work, and management of Robinson Township; Kulik after 13 years as a Kennedy Township commissioner and service as Kotik's aide.
Fred Trello said on the House floor that the right to life begins at conception. His record includes six affirmative House actions on direct right-to-life or abortion legislation—HB 71, HB 1436, SB 742, SB 439, HB 668, and SB 369—plus direct abortion-restriction co-sponsorships including HB 1361, HB 1979, and HB 1908.
Nick Kotik publicly described himself as pro-life. His six distinct direct abortion-policy episodes include abortion-facility safety standards, an ultrasound bill, abortion-clinic regulation, the enacted ACA-exchange coverage restriction, hospital admitting privileges, and co-sponsorship of a 20-week and dismemberment-abortion bill.
Kulik told WESA she held a firm pro-life position, did not expect to change it, and believed many people in her district agreed.
Kulik cast eight final House votes involving abortion or closely related fetal-remains policy: SB 3 in 2017; HB 2050 in 2018; HB 321, HB 1890, and SB 857 in 2019; HB 1500 and HB 118 in 2021; and a 2025 vote against HB 1957's proposed constitutional protection for reproductive liberty. She also co-sponsored HB 2050, HB 321, HB 1890, and HB 1500.
Kulik also broke with House Democrats on firearms in 2025: she was one of only three Democratic representatives to vote against HB 1593's universal-background-check policy.
On transit funding, Kulik voted to redirect existing sales-tax revenue. Bloam supported a different package containing a new 6% ride-hail tax, a rental-car fee increase from $2 to $6.50, and a lease charge increase from 3% to 5%.
Kulik's public energy record spans natural gas, clean hydrogen, carbon capture, nuclear power, and renewables. Bloam's accessible public energy agenda is renewables-centered and offers no comparably detailed plan for Pennsylvania natural gas or its workers.
Bloam accepted backing conditioned on protecting and expanding legal abortion and dismantling barriers.
Bloam's abortion position reverses more than five decades of pro-life Democratic representation. Her tax, school-policy, and firearms positions, plus Vote Mama's published endorsement requirements, show that the break is broader.
District boundaries changed over this period. The record describes the seat's representatives, not an unchanged electorate or agreement by every officeholder or voter on every issue. Some cited bills did not become law, and no historical bill is presented as an exact match for a current candidate position. Bloam did not call for banning natural gas or fossil fuels and expressly rejected an abrupt shutdown. She supported Transit for All but did not separately enumerate each rate in that package.
COMPARISON 01 / ROOTS + LOCAL SERVICE
Kulik spent her life in the communities she represented, and James Julius was born and raised in the district where he is raising his family. Bloam moved into District 45 in 2021 and brings an explicitly outside perspective with no comparable elected or municipal record.
Kulik's official biography says she was born in Carnegie. In her retirement statement, she described District 45 as the communities where she grew up, spent her life, and served.
District 45's recent representatives learned local government before Harrisburg: Fred Trello served nine years on Coraopolis Council; Nick Kotik served eight years on McKees Rocks Council, worked 13 years as Trello's aide, and managed Robinson Township; Anita Kulik served 13 years as a Kennedy Township commissioner before working as Kotik's legislative assistant.
Kulik's public biography also documents Char-West Council of Governments work, representation of domestic-violence survivors, fire-department and youth-organization fundraising, parish service, and Rotary membership.
Bloam grew up in Elk County and moved into District 45 from Squirrel Hill in 2021. She described her 2026 candidacy as offering an outside fresh perspective.
Bloam is a first-time candidate. Her law-firm biography documents genuine professional and pro-bono service, but no comparable elected or local-government record.
James Julius's campaign biography says he was born and raised in Robinson Township, built his business in the district, and is raising his family here.
A Gettysburg College publication identified Bloam as a research analyst for the Democratic Caucus of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in 2008—an early Harrisburg role relevant to her 2026 description of offering outside fresh perspectives.
Bloam herself credited Kulik with attending community events and knowing what was happening across the district, while describing her own candidacy as an outside fresh perspective.
The service record continued in office: Kulik announced equipment grants for four local police departments and funding for 13 fire and EMS organizations. She also prime-sponsored the bipartisan abandoned-boats measure enacted as Act 28 of 2025.
Her independent streak was measurable. Kulik supported several Western Pennsylvania energy measures opposed by most House Democrats: only 7 voting Democrats backed HB 1947, 18 backed HB 637, and 4 backed HB 2461. She separately told KDKA she opposed a shale severance tax because Western Pennsylvania needed the jobs.
That pattern matched earlier and later assessments: Kotik predicted an independent voice; WESA reported Kulik as one of the region's more conservative Democrats on abortion and firearms; and a 2023 Inquirer analysis found she crossed toward the Republican leader relatively often on divided votes.
Bloam has lived in the broader Pittsburgh area longer than five years, and her current home is where her husband grew up; this record does not claim that she has no ties to the region or deny her community involvement. The 2008 publication establishes one early House Caucus role; it does not establish its duration, a continuous Harrisburg career, or elected service. Kulik was not uniformly conservative: she supported labor and public schools and later voted to raise the minimum wage. The energy bills had contested environmental and local-control effects, and none of the three cited 2022 measures became law. Kulik's endorsement of Bloam and her committee's reported $1,000 contribution remain disclosed on this page.
COMPARISON 02 / PREBORN LIFE
This is not a one-vote distinction. Kulik's stated position and repeated final House votes established a durable pro-life record; Bloam's own words and accepted endorsement conditions establish the opposite policy direction.
Kulik described a firm pro-life position to WESA, said she did not expect to change it, and believed many people in her district agreed.
She cast eight final House votes involving abortion or closely related fetal-remains policy from 2017 through 2025: SB 3, HB 2050, HB 321, HB 1890, SB 857, HB 1500, HB 118, and a vote against HB 1957's proposed constitutional protection for reproductive liberty.
Bloam told WESA she strongly supported reproductive rights and opposed government involvement in the decision.
Bloam accepted States Win backing conditioned on protecting and expanding legal abortion and dismantling barriers.
Five votes were direct abortion-policy votes. HB 118 and HB 1890 addressed fetal-remains disposition, and SB 857 was a broader telemedicine bill containing a medication restriction. Several measures did not become law; the comparison does not claim that every vote was identical in scope.
COMPARISON 04 / TRANSIT + TAXES
The two records show Kulik supporting a plan that redirected existing sales-tax revenue and Bloam supporting a different package containing a new tax and higher charges.
Kulik voted for HB 1364, a transit plan described on the House floor as redirecting existing sales-tax revenue without raising new taxes in the immediate future.
Bloam supported Transit for All, whose official sponsors identify one new tax and two higher charges.
This does not prove Kulik opposed Transit for All, establish either candidate's position on every tax, or mean HB 1364 became law. Bloam did not separately enumerate each package rate.
COMPARISON 05 / WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ENERGY
Kulik's record spans natural gas, clean hydrogen, carbon capture, nuclear power, and renewables. Bloam's accessible public energy record is centered on renewables—especially solar—and offers no comparably detailed plan for Pennsylvania natural gas or the workers connected to it.
Kulik co-circulated an official energy-choice proposal covering natural gas, solar, wind, geothermal, and 'all forms of energy.' The memo was not introduced as legislation.
Kulik voted for the enacted PA EDGE package, an omnibus law supporting Pennsylvania natural-gas manufacturing and clean-hydrogen projects with carbon-capture, employment, and capital-investment provisions.
She also voted for community-solar legislation and joined a unanimous House vote modernizing Pennsylvania's regulation of small modular nuclear reactors and microreactors.
Kulik separately opposed a shale severance tax on the grounds that Western Pennsylvania needed the jobs. She also backed three 2022 energy measures opposed by most voting House Democrats: only 7 Democrats backed HB 1947, 18 backed HB 637, and 4 backed HB 2461.
At the May 5 forum, Bloam said Pennsylvania should transition toward more renewable energy, invest in more wind and solar, reduce red tape, and streamline renewable projects while protecting local communities.
In the following answer, Bloam said the state should enforce existing corporate pollution rules and consider making them more stringent.
Her bylined 2024 solar-development article advocated enabling legislation, public funding opportunities, and streamlined permitting for solar and community-solar projects.
In a July 28 interview, Bloam added an important limit: she said the transition must be slow and thoughtful and that Pennsylvania cannot simply 'pull the plug' on fossil fuels without significant consequences.
Bloam did not call for banning natural gas or fossil fuels; her July 28 answer expressly rejected an abrupt shutdown. An incomplete public record does not prove opposition to natural gas, nuclear power, or other sources. Kulik's PA EDGE vote involved an omnibus law, her energy-choice memo was not introduced, and several cited bills had contested environmental or local-control effects. This is a documented contrast in public record and emphasis—not either candidate's complete energy plan.
COMPARISON 00 / DISTRICT FIRST?
Kulik publicly described District 45 as the reason she broke with progressive colleagues. Organizations working to elect Bloam call her the progressive candidate and describe the seat as important to party control.
Kulik told WESA, ‘But that's my district. My district is different,’ while explaining why she stood apart from progressive colleagues.
States Win called Bloam the qualified progressive candidate and described District 45 as vital to the one-seat House majority.
Working Families Party says it worked hand-in-hand with Bloam's campaign for months and expected to continue through the general election.
Both women have discussed local issues, and supporting a party majority is common. This comparison does not claim Bloam has no local priorities or that an outside organization controls her.
COMPARISON 03 / FIREARMS
On the 2025 House proposal, Kulik broke with House Democrats and voted no. Vote Mama's published endorsement rule requires every endorsed candidate to support universal background checks and an assault-weapons ban, and Vote Mama lists Bloam as endorsed.
HB 1593 would have removed Pennsylvania's private-transfer exception for long guns, effectively requiring background checks for all firearm purchases.
The House passed it 104–99 on September 30, 2025. Kulik voted no; contemporaneous reporting identified her as one of only three House Democrats to oppose it.
In a June 2022 column about gun violence, Kulik wrote that police and first responders should be properly funded, existing laws should be enforced, and common-sense laws should be debated. She added that solutions require compromise and listening to each other.
Vote Mama says every endorsed candidate must commit to every Candidate Pledge priority. Its firearms priority calls for universal background checks and banning assault weapons.
Vote Mama officially lists Bloam as endorsed. Her campaign filing reports a $2,500 Vote Mama contribution received May 14, 2026.
Kulik's column predates HB 1593 by more than three years and is evidence of her broader firearms approach—not an explanation of this specific vote. No attributable contemporaneous statement explaining her reason for voting no was located. She voted for a different amended background-check measure, HB 714, in 2023, so this record does not call her uniformly opposed to background checks. Vote Mama's published rule, official Bloam page, and the filed contribution establish the endorsement relationship; this record does not possess Bloam's executed pledge form.
THE DISTRICT-FIRST CHOICE / WHY JAMES JULIUS
James Julius has a documented District 45 background and has published clear commitments on affordability, infrastructure, energy, jobs, first responders, constituent service, and innocent life.
DOCUMENTED BACKGROUND — James Julius's campaign biography says he was born and raised in Robinson Township, built his business in the district, and is raising his family here.
DOCUMENTED BACKGROUND — WESA independently reported that he is a lifelong Southwestern Pennsylvania resident, founded an artificial-intelligence company, and organized his campaign around Build, Grow, and Protect priorities.
JAMES'S COMMITMENT — His published local agenda calls for lower household and energy costs, an all-of-the-above energy strategy, better roads and infrastructure, Western Pennsylvania jobs, and strong police, fire, and EMS services.
JAMES'S COMMITMENT — His published life position commits to defending preborn life and equal protection under Pennsylvania law.
Background facts and campaign commitments are different from a legislative voting record. James Julius has not served in the General Assembly; this record presents his stated commitments as commitments, not accomplishments.
COMPARISON 06 / ICE COOPERATION
Kulik supported one defined State Police-to-ICE alert. Bloam expressed a broader nonparticipation position but has not answered that exact alert provision.
Kulik voted for a measure requiring State Police to notify ICE when a firearm background check identified an unlawfully present prohibited purchaser.
Bloam opposed state funding for what she called federal immigration overreach and said state employees should not participate in federal actions that undermine trust.
Bloam has not answered that exact alert provision. The comparison does not prove disagreement in every enforcement circumstance, open borders, abolishing ICE, or disregard of judicial warrants.